I tried to note this in the article and felt that this would be expanded on if the article was allowed to stand. However the article was redirected within an hour, or less, of it's posting and so had no chance to expanded on by others.

The problem with redirecting this article to wikitonary site is that the term there is completly diffrent in meaning. This means redirecting the refernce deletes my article without giving it a chance for discussion. I know several people have written an article with the same title as either a joke or a simple defintion. I tried to write an article that had some culutral refrences as well as a diffention of the term without unnessessarry vulgarity. I hope that you will reconsider letting that article be brought back (I notice it has been redirected several times) or telling me why it is not an article worth having (a very similar term, choad, has it's own article). At the very least I would like to see it as an article considered for deletion so that the subject could be discussed. Thank you very much for your time and the links that you sent me.- Cenestrad 20:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC) Hi, I still think the real problem here is that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, which is an official policy on Wikipedia (and just because some other word has slipped through I don't see that as a good reason to let another). It's also worth looking at an earlier version of the article: Thanks/ wangi 18:00, 1 January 2006 (UTC) Ok, have AfD'd this article as you suggested: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taint. Thanks/ wangi 13:25, 3 January 2006 (UTC) First I would like to thank you for redirecting the Taint article to the Articles for deletion page. I don't care so much if my article is deleted as long as it's given a chance. Now a simple question Is the term 'ain't' used at all in Europe as far as you can tell? I have gathered that Taint is not but I am unsure to as the term ain't. Again thank you for your time - Cenestrad 04:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Sure, ain't is widely understood, Thanks/L I'm not agreeing that the quotation from the Daily Show cited of the use of taint really applies in this case.

Thoughts? Qualheim 03:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Articles for Deletion debate In context, it sounds like the congressman was using a form of 'tainted', meaning spoiled. Splash talk 00:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Other terms This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. Other slang terms for the perinieum include SPOSBAG, Grundel, Choad, The Space Between & Fleshy Fun Bridge. Or not: they googled (for me) between nothing at all and a couple of hundred.

Unfortunately there is something about any article related to the areas normally covered by underwear which brings out the adolescent in everybody - especially adolescents. No, this is not getting at Cenestrad, who was just tidying the cruft into one place. The sniggering community will always edit articles like this for the same reason they always look up rude words first in every dictionary. Point of order: ' Choad' refers to the penis, particularly when erect.Just zis Guy, you know? / 20:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC) Luckily the ones here all have Internet access, so as soon as they learn to evade AOLs parental controls they can look at some real smut and leave the 'edia alone.

Fleshy fun bridge lakota